Saturday, March 16, 2013

free expression



What constitutes the rights of an “artist” to make a statement? Is it protected speech? Or, does it simply become an object, a thing, once it is created?

This new “expression” near my home covers part of a mural at a playground that had already seen additional “expression” by graffiti artists.

The first amendment to the Constitution is central to how Americans see our rights. Restrictions on expressing our opinions, ideas, hopes & fears are sometimes seen as unlimited. Yet, there are dozens of restrictions from incitement to a crime to defamation or obscenity.

Artists, whom I respect, in our community argue that graffiti is free speech. Yet, defacing the "speech" of another is a line that I am unwilling to negotiate. If freedom to make an artistic statement impinges on the rights of others…for speech, for property rights, for a livable community…should it be protected? When it is egregious disregard for community values and simply blatant egotism, I can't justify it.

And, when the building is finally re-painted as protection against the weather, is that an infringement on the speech of the muralist, the graffiti artist and the most recent shadow painter?



4 comments:

  1. Provocative commentary. Much as I love Banksy's work, I think I come down on the side of the anti-graffitists (new word?). That position may have evolved from my deeper involvement in the Denver gang graffiti scene. A dangerous thing, in that context. I'm under no illusions that graffiti is, or should be, protected speech, in any event.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I am torn about graffiti as a political statement, when it can be clearly defined as that. But, much is pure vandalism and ego-centered disregard for the space we all share.

      Delete
  2. I am in agreement with you. There are countless other ways of exercising one's free speech, but this would not be one of them.

    I do however, like the look of the mural in your bottom photograph. If the building owner gave permission for it, I suppose it's not so bad a thing, and perhaps there would then be cause for a bit of remorse when covered up with a fresh coat of paint.

    Over in my neck of the woods, there's mural on a wall by a bus stop in Phoenix with the Saint Francis Prayer that is quite beautiful. Perhaps if people spent more time gazing on it, they'd feel less compelled to deface property elsewhere.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The mural was put up as enhancement for a really run down playground. Recently, the playground and adjacent recreation building/park space was wonderfully renovated. The decision in the community process was that the mural should stay. During construction, however, all the new graffiti was splashed on the mural and last week the wall was further changed with paint being thrown against it. Glad they did not damage the playground.

      Neat that you have the St. Francis prayer in Phoenix...and I live in the city named after him.

      Delete